New form of carbon observed, stronger as diamonds

A team of scientists led by Carnegie’s Lin Wang has observed a new form of very hard carbon clusters, which are unusual in their mix of crystalline and disordered structure. The material is capable of indenting diamond. This finding has potential applications for a range of mechanical, electronic, and electrochemical uses. The work is published in Science on August 17. (from carnegiescience.edu)

Carbon is the fourth-most-abundant element in the universe and takes on a wide variety of forms—the honeycomb-like graphene, the pencil “lead” graphite, diamond, cylindrically structured nanotubes, and hollow spheres called fullerenes.
Some forms of carbon are crystalline, meaning that the structure is organized in repeating atomic units. Other forms are amorphous, meaning that the structure lacks the long-range order of crystals. Hybrid products that combine both crystalline and amorphous elements had not previously been observed, although scientists believed they could be created.
Wang’s team—including Carnegie’s Wenge Yang, Zhenxian Liu, Stanislav Sinogeikin, and Yue Meng—started with a substance called carbon-60 cages, made of highly organized balls of carbon constructed of pentagon and hexagon rings bonded together to form a round, hollow shape. An organic xylene solvent was put into the spaces between the balls and formed a new structure. They then applied pressure to this combination of carbon cages and solvent, to see how it changed under different stresses.
At relatively low pressure, the carbon-60’s cage structure remained. But as the pressure increased, the cage structures started to collapse into more amorphous carbon clusters. However, the amorphous clusters still occupy their original sites, forming a lattice structure.
The team discovered that there is a narrow window of pressure, about 320,000 times the normal atmosphere, under which this new structured carbon is created and does not bounce back to the cage structure when pressure is removed. This is crucial for finding practical applications for the new material going forward.
This material was capable of indenting the diamond anvil used in creating the high-pressure conditions. This means that the material is superhard.
If the solvent used to prepare the new form of carbon is removed by heat treatment, the material loses its lattice periodicity, indicating that the solvent is crucial for maintaining the chemical transition that underlies the new structure. Because there are many similar solvents, it is theoretically possible that an array of similar, but slightly different, carbon lattices could be created using this pressure method.
“We created a new type of carbon material, one that is comparable to diamond in its inability to be compressed,” Wang said. “Once created under extreme pressures, this material can exist at normal conditions, meaning it could be used for a wide array of practical applications.”
Wang’s other co-authors on the paper were Bingbing Liu of Jilin University, Hui Li and Xiao Cheng Zeng of the University of Nebraska, Yang Ding of the Argonne National Laboratory, and Wendy Mao of Stanford University.
__________________
This research was supported by EFree, funded by Basic Energy Sciences, Department of Energy (DOE-BES). HPCAT, APS is supported by the Carnegie Institution for Science; the Carnegie DOE Alliance Center (DCAC); the University of Nevada at Las Vegas; and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory through funding from the National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy (DOE-NNSA). U2A is supported by the National Science Foundation (COMPRES), DOE-NNSA, and DOE-BES.

Schweiz: 100% Erneuerbar – Aber sicher!

Die Stromversorgung der Schweiz ist bis zum Jahre 2025 vollständig auf erneuerbare Quellen umstellbar – und der Solarenergie kommt dabei eine zentrale Rolle zu. (from sonnenseite.com)

So in der Beilage zur neuesten Greenpeace-Zeitschrift (Nr. 3/12). Die 16-seitige Broschüre kommt gerade zum richtigen Moment – steht doch im Herbst die Vernehmlassung zum neuen Energiegesetz an, das in den letzten Wochen bereits bruchstückhaft öffentlich wurde. Dabei geniesst die voraussichtliche Vorlage selbst seitens der Umweltorganisationen gewissen Zuspruch, Alt-Nationalrat und Energiespezialist Rudolf Rechsteiner (siehe dessen Buch “100 Prozent erneuerbar”) ortete darin etwa einen wirkungsvollen ersten Schritt.

Doch müsse der Bund wesentlich weiter gehen, vor allem auch in Bezug auf die Photovoltaik (PV), also auf die Förderung der solaren Stromerzeugung. Die behandelt der Bund weiterhin äusserst stiefmütterlich, obwohl ihre Kostenentwicklung und Potentialanalyse unterdessen schon fast jedem klar gemacht haben: Der PV gehört die Zukunft, auch hierzulande.

Wie das im Einzelnen aussehen kann, zeigt nun die erwähnte Broschüre von Greenpeace. Zusammen mit dem WWF, dem VCS und Pro Natura – aber nicht mehr explizit mit der Schweizerischen Energiestiftung (SES), die noch im letzten Jahr gemeinsam mit der Umweltallianz auftrat – sieht Greenpeace zuallererst den Ausstieg aus der Atomenergie.

Denn die Schweiz könne sich auch ohne AKW sicher, wirtschaftlich und umweltfreundlich mit Strom versorgen. Das könne in einer kürzeren Frist bis 2025 oder in einer längeren bis 2035 geschehen, wobei in erstem Falle für eine Übergangszeit auf Stromimporte aus erneuerbaren Quellen zurückzugreifen wäre. So oder so, bereits in rund einem Dutzend Jahren kann die Solarstromproduktion rund einen Fünftel des danzumaligen Verbrauchs decken.

Einen Gutteil soll auch die Biomasse ausmachen, die auf etwa elf Prozent Anteil kommen kann. Und wichtig wird (natürlich) auch der vermiedene Stromkonsum, also die durch Effizienzmassnahmen eingesparte Energie, die Greenpeace auf rund 14 Terrawattstunden (TWh) beziffert. Womit der Gesamtverbrauch eben nicht höher ausfiele als heute (58 TWh).

Woher aber die eingesparte Energie, die der Produktion von sechs AKW der Grösse von Mühleberg entspricht? Stromfressende Elektroheizungen und –boiler, ineffiziente Industriemotoren, Glühbirnen, Standby-Geräte und viele mehr könnten Stromsparbeiträge leisten – ohne dass letztlich eine Komforteinbusse zu gewärtigen wäre.

Das Potential der Solarenergie dabei nicht nur wegen der Grösse des Beitrags zur künftigen Stromproduktion bedeutend, sondern auch, weil sie ohne die vielerorts befürchtete Verschandelung der Landschaft auskommt.

“Ob Dächer, überdeckte Parkplätze, Strassen- und Lawinenverbauungen – in der Schweiz stehen genügend Flächen für den Zubau zur Verfügung.” Und auch wenn die Sonne nachts nicht scheint: Die bereits bestehende Energieinfrastruktur bietet gute Voraussetzungen für eine Nutzung rund um die Uhr, denn gemäss Greenpeace “reicht die gesamte Kapazität der Schweizer Speicherseen rechnerisch für die Überbrückung von bis zu 85 sonnenlosen Tagen”.

Interessant die Kostenangaben: War vor einem Jahr bei der ersten Präsentation dieses Szenarios noch von fünf Franken pro Jahr und Haushalt die Rede, so nennt die neue Broschüre nun 35 Franken oder total 272 Millionen jährlich. Gibt aber gleichzeitig zu bedenken, dass es auch ohne Atom- und Energiewende teurer werde.

Die Netze müssten eh erneuert werden und die fossilen wie nuklearen Energieträger werden sicherlich bedeutend teurer in der Zukunft. So dass sich der Umstieg auf eine zu 100 Prozent erneuerbare Energieversorgung auch wirtschaftlich auszahlen wird.

Dass das nicht automatisch vonstatten gehen wird, verschweigt Greenpeace nicht. Erstens braucht es ein Massnahmenbündel, zu dem unter anderem vor allem die Aufhebung der beschränkten Förderung von Erneuerbaren (Deckel) gehört, ebenso wie eine Lenkungsabgabe, schnelle Bewilligungsverfahren – und den Beitrag von jedem Einzelnen im Rahmen von Verhaltensänderungenb.

Fossils point to a big family for human ancestors and supporting the idea of some scientists that there is a chance that the cucasians are of different origin

Jaw structures suggest that at least three homo species once roamed the African plains. (from Nature.com)

Fossilized skulls show that at least three distinct species belonging to the genus homo existed between 1.7 million and 2 million years ago, settling a long-standing debate in palaeoanthropology.
A study published this week in Nature focuses on homo rudolfensis, a hominin with a relatively flat face, which was first identified from a single large skull in 1972. Several other big-skulled fossils have been attributed to the species since then, but none has included both a face and a lower jaw. This has been problematic: in palaeoanthropology, faces and jaws function like fingerprints for identifying a specimen as a particular species (which is indicated by the second word in a Linnaean title, such as ‘rudolfensis’), as opposed to the broader grouping of genus (the first word, as in ‘ homo’).

Without complete skulls, it has been difficult to reach a consensus on whether specimens attributed to H. rudolfensis are genuinely members of a distinct species, or actually belong to other homo species that lived around the same time, such as homo habilis or  homo erectus. Understanding how many different homo species there were, and whether they lived concurrently, would help to determine whether the history of the human lineage saw fierce competition between multiple hominins, or a steady succession from one species to another.
But the latest result has dissipated much of this uncertainty. It concerns three fossils — two lower jaws and a juvenile’s lower face — that were found in a desert area called Koobi Fora in northern Kenya. The team that pulled them out of the ground, led by Meave Leakey, a palaeontologist at the Turkana Basin Institute in Nairobi, describes how the dental arcade, the arch created by the teeth at the front of the mouth, is nearly rectangular, just like the palate structure of the 1972 skull. By contrast, the average modern human mouth has a curved dental arcade.
Further evidence comes from the juvenile’s face, which tellingly has cheek bones joining the palate quite far forward. “It was such an extended excitement as the juvenile face slowly emerged from the encasing rock, and its similarity to the 1972 specimen became so striking,” recalls Leakey.

NASA Lands Car-Size Rover Named Curiosity Beside Martian Mountain

PASADENA, Calif. — NASA’s most advanced Mars rover Curiosity has landed on the Red Planet. The one-ton rover, hanging by ropes from a rocket backpack, touched down onto Mars Sunday to end a 36-week flight and begin a two-year investigation. (from nasa.gov)

The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) spacecraft that carried Curiosity succeeded in every step of the most complex landing ever attempted on Mars, including the final severing of the bridle cords and flyaway maneuver of the rocket backpack.

“Today, the wheels of Curiosity have begun to blaze the trail for human footprints on Mars. Curiosity, the most sophisticated rover ever built, is now on the surface of the Red Planet, where it will seek to answer age-old questions about whether life ever existed on Mars — or if the planet can sustain life in the future,” said NASA Administrator Charles Bolden. “This is an amazing achievement, made possible by a team of scientists and engineers from around the world and led by the extraordinary men and women of NASA and our Jet Propulsion Laboratory. President Obama has laid out a bold vision for sending humans to Mars in the mid-2030’s, and today’s landing marks a significant step toward achieving this goal.”

Curiosity landed at 10:32 p.m. Aug. 5, PDT, (1:32 a.m. EDT Aug. 6) near the foot of a mountain three miles tall and 96 miles in diameter inside Gale Crater. During a nearly two-year prime mission, the rover will investigate whether the region ever offered conditions favorable for microbial life.

“The Seven Minutes of Terror has turned into the Seven Minutes of Triumph,” said NASA Associate Administrator for Science John Grunsfeld. “My immense joy in the success of this mission is matched only by overwhelming pride I feel for the women and men of the mission’s team.”

Curiosity returned its first view of Mars, a wide-angle scene of rocky ground near the front of the rover. More images are anticipated in the next several days as the mission blends observations of the landing site with activities to configure the rover for work and check the performance of its instruments and mechanisms.

“Our Curiosity is talking to us from the surface of Mars,” said MSL Project Manager Peter Theisinger of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. “The landing takes us past the most hazardous moments for this project, and begins a new and exciting mission to pursue its scientific objectives.”

Confirmation of Curiosity’s successful landing came in communications relayed by NASA’s Mars Odyssey orbiter and received by the Canberra, Australia, antenna station of NASA’s Deep Space Network.

Curiosity carries 10 science instruments with a total mass 15 times as large as the science payloads on the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity. Some of the tools are the first of their kind on Mars, such as a laser-firing instrument for checking elemental composition of rocks from a distance. The rover will use a drill and scoop at the end of its robotic arm to gather soil and powdered samples of rock interiors, then sieve and parcel out these samples into analytical laboratory instruments inside the rover.

To handle this science toolkit, Curiosity is twice as long and five times as heavy as Spirit or Opportunity. The Gale Crater landing site places the rover within driving distance of layers of the crater’s interior mountain. Observations from orbit have identified clay and sulfate minerals in the lower layers, indicating a wet history.

The mission is managed by JPL for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington. The rover was designed, developed and assembled at JPL. JPL is a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.

For more information on the mission, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/mars and http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/msl .

Follow the mission on Facebook and Twitter at: http://www.facebook.com/marscuriosity And http://www.twitter.com/marscuriosity .

Progress 48 Reaches the ISS

Officials at the Russian Federal Space Agency(RosCosmos) announce that the Progress 48 space capsule reached the International Space Station(ISS) earlier today. What is so special about this particular resupply mission is that the spacecraft docked to the station less than six hours after launch. (from google)

This was the first flight that attempted a new launch and navigation procedure. Usually, Russian Progress and Soyuz capsules take up to two days to track down the orbital lab, before they dock.

Progress 48 launched aboard a Soyuz delivery system from the Baikonur Cosmodrome, in Kazakhstan, at 3:35 pm EDT (1935 GMT), on Thursday, August 1. Its automated docking system saw it latching on the ISS Pirs module at 9:19 pm EDT (0119 GMT), on August 2, less than six hours later.

The successful test of the new flight approach will be very appreciated by astronauts. Currently, all crew rotations aboard the station are handled through Russian Soyuz capsule. These vehicles carry three astronauts at one time, who spend 48 hours crammed up in a tiny space.

RosCosmos orbital engineers have developed the new paths for the capsules so that the flight is made as comfortable as possible for the crew. It was first tested on Progress 48 because this is an unmanned, resupply flight.

The cargo capsule carries food, water, scientific experiments, propellant for the ISS thrusters, and personal items for the six astronauts making up the Expedition 32 crew, Space reports.

The Russians are “looking to eventually take this into the Soyuz phase. If you can get the crew to orbit in six hours and onboard the International Space Station, that could be a tremendous benefit over the two-plus days it takes today,” NASA ISS operations and integration manager, Dan Harman, said.

In addition to extra comfort for the crew, the capsules themselves could carry more cargo, since the amount of fuel currently needed for two days of travel could be eliminated.

“The quicker rendezvous that you have, the less consumables you would need for the first day, and the better crew comfort in a small capsule,” ISS flight director Chris Edelen added.

The official says that same-day launch and docking procedures are very complex, and require tremendous amounts of calculations. Both the launching spacecraft and the ISS have to be in very precise positions when liftoff occurs.

Progress 48 is scheduled to remain docked to the ISS until December. After undocking, it will be purposefully destroyed in the upper atmosphere.

The rise of graphene

Graphene is a rapidly rising star on the horizon of materials science and condensed-matter physics. This strictly two-dimensional material exhibits exceptionally high crystal and electronic quality, and, despite its short history, has already revealed a cornucopia of new physics and potential applications, which are briefly discussed here. Whereas one can be certain of the realness of applications only when commercial products appear, graphene no longer requires any further proof of its importance in terms of fundamental physics. Owing to its unusual electronic spectrum, graphene has led to the emergence of a new paradigm of ‘relativistic’ condensed-matter physics, where quantum relativistic phenomena, some of which are unobservable in high-energy physics, can now be mimicked and tested in table-top experiments. More generally, graphene represents a conceptually new class of materials that are only one atom thick, and, on this basis, offers new inroads into low-dimensional physics that has never ceased to surprise and continues to provide a fertile ground for applications.

by A. K. GEIM AND K. S. NOVOSELOV from Nature (truncated)

Graphene is the name given to a flat monolayer of carbon atoms tightly packed into a two-dimensional (2D) honeycomb lattice, and is a basic building block for graphitic materials of all other dimensionalities. It can be wrapped up into 0D fullerenes, rolled into 1D nanotubes or stacked into 3D graphite. Theoretically, graphene (or ‘2D graphite’) has been studied for sixty years, and is widely used for describing properties of variouscarbon-based materials. Forty years later, it was realized that graphene also provides an excellent condensed-matter analogue of (2+1)-dimensional quantum electrodynamics, which propelled graphene into a thriving theoretical toy model. On the other hand, although known as an integral part of 3D materials, graphene was presumed not to exist in the free state, being described as an ‘academic’ material and was believed to be unstable with respect to the formation of curved structures such as soot, fullerenes and nanotubes. Suddenly, the vintage model turned into reality, when free-standing  graphene was unexpectedly found three years ago — and especially when the follow-up experiments confirmed that its charge carriers were indeed massless Dirac fermions. So, the graphene ‘gold rush’ has begun.

In the absence of quality graphene wafers, most experimental groups are currently using samples obtained by micromechanical cleavage of bulk graphite, the same technique that allowed the isolation of graphene for the first time. After fine-tuning, the technique now provides high-quality graphene crystallites up to 100 μm in size, which is sufficient for most research purposes. Superficially, the technique looks no more sophisticated than drawing with a piece of graphite8 or its repeated peeling with adhesive tape until the thinnest flakes are found. A similar approach was tried by other groups but only graphite flakes 20 to 100 layers thick were found.

At low temperatures, all metallic systems with high resistivity should inevitably exhibit large quantum-interference (localization) magnetoresistance, eventually leading to the metal–insulator transition at σ ≈ e2/h. Such behaviour was thought to be universal,
but it was found missing in graphene.

Despite the reigning optimism about graphene-based electronics, ‘graphenium’ microprocessors are unlikely to appear for the next 20 years. In the meantime, many other graphene-based applications are likely to come of age. In this respect, clear parallels with nanotubes allow a highly educated guess of what to expect soon. The most immediate application for graphene is probably its use in composite materials. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that a graphene powder of uncoagulated micrometre-size crystallites can be produced in a way scaleable to mass production. This allows conductive plastics at less than one volume percent filling, which in combination with low production costs makes graphene-based composite materials attractive for a variety of uses. However, it seems doubtful that such composites can match the mechanical strength of their nanotube counterparts because of much stronger entanglement in the latter case. Another enticing possibility is the use of graphene powder in electric batteries that are already one of the main markets for graphite. An ultimately large surface-to-volume ratio and high conductivity provided by graphene powder can lead to improvements in the efficiency of batteries, taking over from the carbon nanofibres used
in modern batteries. Carbon nanotubes have also been considered for this application but graphene powder has an important advantage of being cheap to produce. One of the most promising applications for nanotubes is field emitters, and although there have been no reports yet about such use of graphene, thin graphite flakes were used in plasma displays (commercial prototypes) long before graphene was isolated, and many patents were filed on this subject. It is likely that graphene powder can offer even more superior emitting properties. Carbon nanotubes have been reported to be an excellent material for solid-state gas sensors but graphene offers clear advantages in this particular direction. Spin-valve and superconducting fieldeffect transistors are also obvious research targets, and recent reports describing a hysteretic  magnetoresistance and substantial bipolar supercurrents prove graphene’s major potential for these applications. An extremely weak spin-orbit coupling and the absence of hyperfine interaction in 12C-graphene make it an excellent if not ideal material for making spin qubits. This guarantees graphene-based quantum computation to become an active research area. Finally, we cannot omit mentioning hydrogen storage, which has been an active but controversial subject for nanotubes. It has already been suggested that graphene is capable of absorbing a large amount of hydrogen, and experimental efforts in this direction are duly expected.

It has been just a few years since graphene was first reported, and despite remarkably rapid progress, only the very tip of the iceberg has been uncovered so far. Because of the short timescale, most experimental groups working now on graphene have not published even a single paper on the subject, which has been a truly frustrating experience for theorists. This is to say that, at this time, no review can possibly be complete. Nevertheless, the research directions explained here should persuade even die-hard
sceptics that graphene is not a fleeting fashion but is here to stay, bringing up both more exciting physics, and perhaps even wideranging applications.